Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Have you ever entered into a formal contract?
Upcoming Events for BLaw
- Unit 1 - Review
- Chapter 7 - How Contracts Arise
- various law articles
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would implement a policy to prevent it, because if we stop it than we don't have to worry about rehabilitating those of whom are guilty. This would be a public policy.
ReplyDeleteI would choose the public policy of prevention. This would be a public policy to regulate the safety of the people
ReplyDeleteI would choose a public policy in regards to vandalism so that it would prevent it rather than rehabilitate afterwards. I would choose the prevention policy because rather than cleaning up afterwards, you would save money, time, and the offender's record, by preventing the act in the first place. The public policy would be the protection of the public.
ReplyDeleteRehabilitation. It would be a morals of the people public policy because it is not ethnically right to vandalize other people's property or buildings.
ReplyDeletei think the prevention of vandalism would be the most helpful by adding more watch to that area,such as cameras,police or some sort of guard. And the policy would be the protection of the public.
ReplyDeleteMatt Price said...
ReplyDeleteI would choose Implementing Public Policy, once it's been implemented, law breaking and other damages would be less likely to exist once enforcement is taken into a more seriousness by society.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would chose a prevention policy. Aware the public how it is very wrong to vandalize and with that put cameras up and have police be on the watch out for suspicious act. This would be a public policy.
ReplyDeleteI would choose prevention. I think more harsh sentences for vandalism, such as larger fines, would persuade people to stop vandalizing property, especially in this economy. This would be a policy for the public.
ReplyDeleteI would use rehabilitation. After they go to rehab they may have a better look on life. It's a lot more humane. I like that choice much better because it's not as violent. But of course, like all other plans, there are flaws in this one as well.
ReplyDeletei would choose the rehabilitation on vandalism because it could help alot of people like if they steal things in stores i would talk to them about it and prevent them from doing it help them find a way to get their mind out of the stealing and things like that but i would like to help people rehabilitate
ReplyDeleteI would Choose Public Policy to stop it because if you just put the criminals in rehabilitation then they still could come out of it and commit the crime again. The public policy would be protection of the public
ReplyDeletei would choose the prevention on vandalism because we wouldn't have to worry about rehabilitating people if we just prevented it. It would be a public policy.
ReplyDeleteI would chose prevention policy. I would chose it because if you chose rehabilitation they could get out and commit the crime again but if you chose prevention policy they would not have a chance to do it again.
ReplyDelete